New York Ad Startups – Location, Location, Location

Feb 9, 2010 – 09:00 by Ryan

east broad top #14
Creative Commons License photo credit: Sideshow Bruce

Last week, AM New York published a list of the hottest startups in NYC. The amNY article started us thinking about all the advertising-focused startups located in New York City. In today’s Internet-based world, location is less important than it was in the past; however, proximity to the epicenter of advertising, Madison Avenue, is still important. For this post, we researched advertising startups located in NYC that have been in business for five years or less.

Startups

  • AdMeld – An ad-optimization platform focusing on large, premium web publishers
  • AdSafe Media – Brand protection data provider
  • AppNexus – Real-time bidding platform and cloud hosting provider
  • Better Advertising – Provides more transparency to the advertising process
  • Clickable – An online solution for search advertising automation
  • Collective – A premium, audience-focused advertising technology solution
  • Demdex – Behavioral data management solutions
  • Double Verify – Brand protection and campaign validation (NYC HQ, eng. in Israel)
  • Exelate Media – A marketplace for behavioral targeting data (NYC HQ, eng. in Israel)
  • Medialets – Mobile advertising platform
  • MediaMath – A demand side platform
  • Peer39 – Semantic advertising solutions (NYC HQ, eng. in Israel)
  • Pontiflex – Focused on cost per lead
  • Yieldex – Publisher inventory management

Nearby

There are several notable advertising startups making waves in Boston and Philadelphia, but for the purpose of this article, close does not count.

Note

If we missed any notable advertising startups located in NYC, please contact us and we will edit the list.

News Corp. Discusses Removal From Google’s Search Index

Nov 23, 2009 – 08:23 by Ryan

newscorplogo

Recently, News Corp. has been making a lot of noise about removing their web properties from Google’s search index. This appears to be a desperate move being made by a company that has not adequately embraced the culture or technology of the Internet. The important aspect of a total removal from Google that is not being discussed is how News Corp. would potentially screw thousands of businesses that have outbound links from their web properties.

Partners

Google uses a concept of “trust” when they assemble their search index. In theory, if a popular and trusted site like The Wall Street Journal (a News Corp. company) links to a site, Google is going to pass link juice or link equity to that site. The theory is that if the WSJ trusts you, then you are probably an OK site (i.e., not full of spam and the content quality is similar). The concept of link equity is similar to the professional references provided to a company when applying for a job.

Future

It appears that News Corp. is an old company and their business/negotiation tactics seem to be based on an outdated machiavellian business philosophy. The future is calling you News Corp., evolve or perish.

Skype Sale Update

Nov 3, 2009 – 21:30 by Ryan

skype_sm

Recently, we looked at the Skype sale drama, and now it appears as if there may be a shift in the deal. Both the NYTimes and GigaOM are reporting that a settlement may soon be reached between Skype co-founders, Janus Friis and Niklas Zennstrom and the private investors acquiring the 65% stake from eBay. The odd men out appear to be Mike Volpi and London-based Index Ventures. Given the legal circumstances, swapping Index Ventures for Atomico Ventures was probably an easy decision for Silverlake Partners, CPP and Andreessen Horowitz.

The Latest Skype Deal Drama

Sep 19, 2009 – 11:15 by Ryan

Skype Logo

Recently, it was announced that eBay sold 65% of Skype to a consortium of private investors, led by Silver Lake for $2.75 billion. At first, this deal sounded great considering eBay purchased Skype for $2.6 billion in 2005 and was never was able to realize the original goal of integrating the product into its online auction service. However, more information has come out that makes this look like a potentially enormous mistake for the new investors. When eBay (at the time led by Meg Whitman) purchased Skype from Niklas Zennström and Janus Friis, Whitman failed to secure the rights to core P2P intellectual property. Failing to secure the core IP, known as the Global Index Software (GI Software) was an enormous mistake that potentially borders on negligence. Whitman,  who is now interested in becoming the Governor of California, may feel the sting of this mistake as people question her ability to properly manage the negotiation of complex deals.

Global Index Software

The core P2P IP (the GI Software) in Skype is still owned by Zennström and Friis in a holding company known as Joltid. Their company has licensed the GI Software to several companies including one of their latest ventures Joost, a video distribution company. Until recently, the CEO of Joost was former Cisco executive Mike Volpi. While at Joost, Volpi led the company away from a P2P approach (using the GI Software) and towards a CDN or semi-centralized content distribution architecture. This was a relatively smart move on Volpi’s part because of the limited upload speeds available to most home Internet connections. Limited upload speeds mean that it takes a lot of dormant/idle computers to serve HD content to a single user. Without an enormous install base, the Joost P2P product appeared to have difficulty streaming high definition content. While leading the migration away from the P2P framework, the Joost engineers had access to the GI Software source code. The transition was not trivial and it cost Joost a lot of time/money. More importantly, this gave Volpi experience in leading a migration away from the same proprietary software in Skype, which — thanks to eBay — is not owned by the company. Not too long ago, we wrote a post about Skype’s Achilles’ heel in their P2P core. Undoubtedly, we are not the only people who see the long-term issues with the P2P core.

Focus on Volpi

The major issues for Silver Lake are the new lawsuits against them and the people involved in the deal. Recently, Volpi’s employment at Joost was terminated. In a new lawsuit filed by Zennström and Friis, they alledge that Volpi (while still an employee of Joost) used his proprietary knowledge of the GI Software (and how to migrate away from it) to shop a deal around to investors to purchase Skype. They also claim that he recruited Joost engineers who worked on Joost’s migration away from the GI Software to Skype. Of course there are always two sides (at least) to every story, but the lawsuit against Volpi looks incredibly damning. This of course is up to the courts to decide but the impact on Volpi’s reputation may extend a lot further than this deal.

Future

We hope all this will not impact the availability of Skype. We use the product a lot but are concerned that the company/product may not weather these times well, due to its current legal woes. Perhaps the smartest thing would be to pay Zennström and Friis to go away, but we fear their price may be too high.

Happy Talk Like A Pirate Day!

Sun Shines On Oracle Part Deux

May 13, 2009 – 22:03 by Ryan
oralogo_small sun

In a previous post, we discussed the history of Oracle and MySQL. In this post we will focus on Oracle’s relationship with its new star, Java.

History

Oracle made its first big move into the Java space in 2001 when it acquired a non-exclusive license for the source code of Sweden-based IronFlare AB’s Orion Application Server to serve as the foundation for the Oracle Application Server. Oracle continued to make progress in the J2EE space for the next few years, but it was always stuck behind JBoss, WebLogic, WepShere and others.  Rumors circulated around BEA Systems for years that Oracle was interested in purchasing the company until 2008 when Oracle finally acquired the company. With the BEA acquisition, Oracle came into control of a superior Java Application Server (WebLogic) and one of the few really good Java virtual machines, JRockit. The acquisition of Sun and, subsequently, Java puts Oracle firmly in control of the Java industry.

Future

The majority of the Java virtual machine was open sourced under the GPL V2 license in 2007 via the OpenJDK project. Several libraries related to the Java 2D APIs were withheld because of previous license agreements Sun had made. If Oracle decides to stop supporting free and open source Java, there will be a void in the industry that would require Google, IBM, HP and others to invest heavily in the language to keep dominance away from Oracle.

We expect IBM to make a play for Red Hat before they lose too much of its competitive edge in the software infrastructure industry.

Relevance

According to the May 2009 TIOBE Programming Community Index, Java comprises the dominant 19.537% of the programming language mindset.  The ownership of the Java space gives Oracle a problematic amount of control and influence over the Java platform. As server operating systems become less relevant in favor of logic embedded in platform independent Java, Oracle is well positioned to place extreme pressure on all of Microsoft’s server solutions. Additionally, most of the modern scripting languages have been embedded into the Java virtual machine so the platform truly transcends Linux, Windows, Mac OSX, Solaris etc. Google’s new operating system, Android, is based on Linux but the APIs exposed to developers are primarily Java-based. Additionally, Google also recently released Java support for its platform solution, App Engine, and its Web Toolkit is also based on Java.

With an uneven power shift over the Java platform, it is completely possible that innovation of Java will not continue at its current pace.

Growth

We would like to see Google participate more in funding, development and maintenance of the OpenJDK project to help ensure innovation is pushed forward and Oracle is kept at a safe distance from discontinuing open source releases.

Sun Shines On Oracle

May 2, 2009 – 12:25 by Ryan
oralogo_small sun

Recently, after a failed bid by IBM, Sun announced that they will be selling the company to Oracle for $7.4B. At Deft Labs, we saw the writing on the wall for this deal in January of 2008. This post examines the historical relationship between Oracle and MySQL and looks at the potential impact on the immensely popular open source database.

History

Innobase, the Finnish software company responsible for InnoDB (one of the storage engines available in MySQL) was sold to Oracle in 2005. Oracle made another move against MySQL in 2006 when they purchased Sleepycat, the company responsible for Berkeley DB,  the low-level open source software which Innobase built InnoDB on top of. Oracle also attempted to purchase MySQL in 2006 but then CEO Marten Mickos told reporters, “We will be part of a larger company, but it will be called MySQL.” It is no wonder Mickos turned down the offer. Most open source advocates probably would have seen an Oracle deal as a betrayal. MySQL continued to progress until they sold to the open source-friendly Sun in January of 2008.

Future

We do not forsee any changes in the status quo for the next year or two. After that, we expect to see more of Oracle’s proprietary database technology in MySQL (which will not be available in the open source/developer edition).

Relevance

Several so-called “web scale” databases are beginning to mature. Most of these databases are document-oriented and typically reduce the amount of logic that can be executed in the database/storage layer in favor of more modern techniques which process data in the application layer. A few of the “web scale” databases available are:

In a nutshell, with the migration to a new database paradigm, the loss of MySQL to Oracle will probably not be the worst thing in the world.

Microsoft vs. Google – The GPS Patents

Mar 3, 2009 – 22:57 by Ryan

google_logo

microsoft_logo

Recently, it was announced that Microsoft is suing GPS device manufacturer, TomTom over GPS patent violations. TomTom runs on the open source Linux operating system and a lot of people believe this is an attempt by Microsoft to assert their perceived intellectual property rights over Linux.

Normally, this news would not be too exciting, but this time it appears as if Microsoft may be up to their old tricks again. It is widely rumored that several netbook manufacturers have plans to ship devices with Google’s Linux-based operating system, Android. If Microsoft is able to scare netbook manufacturers away from shipping devices with Linux then they may be able to maintain Windows’ stranglehold as people migrate to inexpensive mobile laptops.

Eric Schmidt, Google’s CEO, said, “netbook” three times today during his presentation at the Morgan Stanley Technology Conference.

Note: We have to give credit to Google’s sense of humor. A week before the Microsoft vs. TomTom news broke, Google announced that they would go to any length to fight off patent trolls.

Craigslist – A Haven For Pirated Software?

Mar 1, 2009 – 13:53 by Ryan

craigslist

Recently, we upgraded one of our Macbook Pro laptops with the idea of selling the old model on Craigslist. Within an hour of posting the laptop, there were a handful of interested parties. The question asked by most of the interested parties was, “What software is installed?” This question seemed odd but after reviewing some of the other Macbook Pros for sale, we realized that people were selling their laptops with expensive Adobe and Microsoft software installed. The real question is, are they also selling the license for the software? If the seller does not include the license for the software, then he/she is selling pirated software. For example, one post claimed the following software was installed:

  • Adobe CS4 Master Collection: $2,499.00
  • Microsoft Office 2008: $399.00

This means for $2,000 you get a laptop worth $1,800 and software worth $2,898. What most people don’t realize is that the software is pirated and they are not selling a valid license. It is amazing that Adobe and Microsoft have not cracked down on this potentially illegal market. The reckless disregard for intellectual property rights is disturbing, although for a site that has been dealing with prostitution and human trafficking, it appears to be par for the course.

Updated: Craigslist bowed to legislative threats from around the United States and removed their erotic-services category in favor of a legal adult services category. Each post to this new category must be manually approved by Craigslist for a $5 fee.

Review: The 2008 Social Technology Predictions

Dec 7, 2008 – 22:47 by Ryan

dharma
Creative Commons License photo credit: dharma

Technology predictions are always challenging. A detailed knowledge of the past and a thorough understanding of the industry are required to attempt to predict the future. Major financial upheavals are difficult to predict and can definitely shorten growth cycles.

We are going to review the social technology predictions we made at the end of 2007.

Social Networks

LinkedIn did not purchase Meetup but they were able to raise an additional round of $22.7 million on a valuation of just over $1 billion. There has not been a massive rush to develop applications for the platform but it is not stagnant either. Reviews are mixed about its platform. Given the ease of application development, we are surprised that LinkedIn is not more agile.

According to Compete, Plaxo was able to double its unique monthly visitors in 2008. An impressive number, but Plaxo still feels like it is “the other business social network.”  Perhaps a change in management might help move this product forward.

Facebook made it through what will probably be its largest growth phase (with regards to new user registrations). We predicted Facebook would grow to 100 M+ users and it succeeded by enrolling roughly 120 million unique users.

MySpace looks like it had a rough year. The site’s traffic appears as if it is still being cannibalized by Facebook. Below is the most recent MySpace/Facebook Compete chart:

With its traffic numbers sliding so much, it is amazing that the MySpace big focus appears to be who will be named CEO of its music business.

Ning did not make any acquisitions in 2008 and Marc Andreessen joined the Facebook board. This is a surprising move given that Ning was able to increase its monthly unique visitors by roughly 650%:

Technologies

Google’s OpenSocial has continued to grow and gain strength although it is still lagging Facebook’s application platform. OpenSocial has been strongly criticized for not living up to its “write once, distribute broadly” claims.

OpenId failed to deliver in 2008. The technology was adopted by several large players; however, there is a lot of criticism about the complexity of implementing OpenId.

Browser-based widgets have become the norm for just about every publisher on the Internet. They are primarily seen as additional channels for content distribution. We eventually expect to see a fairly sophisticated “affiliate” model work its way into the widget market.

RSS has continued to move forward. It is considered by many to the be the fastest growing social technology platform. Companies are finally starting to monetize their RSS feeds by inserting advertisements. Gawker Media claims to have seen a 300% gain in their RSS advertising revenue.

Blogs

WordPress appears to be moving ahead at full steam and LiveJournal appears to be toeing the line after its acquisition by Russian based SUP.

Twitter was an obvious success, as predicted. Twitter experienced explosive growth in 2008:

Tumblr also had an explosive year. To date, Compete has reported an annual traffic increase of 387%. We like and use the Tumblr services, but have been a bit disappointed by the evolution (or lack thereof) of the product.

Instant Messaging

Last year, we pleaded for Mozilla to integrate a messaging client into the browser and it appears as if they have made some progress with the 0.13 release of the Instantbird product. We have not had the opportunity to take Instantbird out for a test-drive, but we look forward to doing so.

Google Needs To Buy Akamai

Sep 6, 2008 – 11:26 by Ryan

If you examine the pressure on the content distribution industry by top tier ISPs, it’s clear this industry is changing. ISPs are now competing against their transit and hosting customers for content distribution business. This is a fairly bold move for ISPs, but it’s clear that they’re starting to question where their next spurt of growth lies.

Internet Service Providers

In 2006, Savvis (in what may have been a fatal mistake) sold their CDN business to Level 3 for $125 million. Apparently, AT&T also got the memo and rapidly deployed a CDN.

Globally, the majority of ISPs don’t have a CDN offering and they will continue to lose business to those that offer a “more complete stack.” All of this inevitable consolidation is necessary as the content distribution business becomes more efficient. Panther, one of the commodity CDN players offers a CDN solution for ISPs, and it’s possible that this model will become more prevalent because the majority of ISPs are ill-equipped to provide sophisticated (and cost-effective) CDN services.

Why?

Now, why does Google need to purchase Akamai? If the obvious continues to play out then the ISPs will have a renewed sense of “hand” when dealing with their customers. If Google is serious about becoming the dominant cloud provider then they will need all the leverage they can get when dealing with their peering partners. It’s widely believed that Google owns some of its fiber infrastructure and they have been busy building data centers around the globe.

Legal

The good part about Google acquiring Akamai is that there is solid competition in the CDN space. Akamai is the dominant player, but based on their recent stock performance, it’s clear that the ISPs and commodity players are gaining ground.

We don’t believe a legal protest of this acquisition would have much credibility. Akamai also employs a fair number of PHDs so we imagine it would be an adequate culture fit.

Viacom

Additionally, if Google acquired Akamai then Viacom would be in a precarious position. The company that Viacom is suing over distribution on YouTube would suddenly be distributing their content (Viacom is a large customer of Akamai  – get off my CDN, Sumner Redstone :-)).

Rumors

There have been some recent rumors about Akamai selling so we’re interested so see what unfolds. The real question as Google discontinues its free dinner offering is:  can they spend the $5 billion to acquire Akamai?

See Also: